[2629] in Release_7.7_team
Re: Please strongly consider backing out the zephyr servers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathon Weiss)
Tue Mar 6 06:01:49 2001
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 06:01:45 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200103061101.GAA29078@Bearing-An-Hourglass.mit.edu>
To: John Hawkinson <jhawk@mit.edu>
CC: release-team@mit.edu, op@mit.edu, pismere@mit.edu
In-reply-to: "[2621] in Release_7.7_team"
From: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@MIT.EDU>
Without re-hashing all of the issues that were already mentioned here,
I can answer one of your questions.
> p.s.: I include release-team as the relevent patches that affect this
> were checked into the Athena source tree. I'm not sure what would be
> a better place to raise this (owls?)
Some of this has been said over zephyr, but for completeness...
My personaly opnion is that source-reviewers may have been a more
appropriate list (it wouldn;t be the firs patch taht was objected to
post-commit). That said, release-team was definately a better choice
than owls. Owls operates more in the policy and financial domain,
while release-team is the escallation path for unresolvable
differences on source-reviewers.
--
Jonathon
