[2481] in Release_7.7_team
Re: Wrapper question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Garry Zacheiss)
Tue Nov 7 20:19:22 2000
Message-Id: <200011080119.UAA01195@riff-raff-w20.mit.edu>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
cc: Garry Zacheiss <zacheiss@MIT.EDU>, Alex T Prengel <alexp@MIT.EDU>,
release-team@MIT.EDU, ajfox@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Nov 2000 22:19:13 EST."
<200011070319.WAA14873@egyptian-gods.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 20:19:17 -0500
From: Garry Zacheiss <zacheiss@MIT.EDU>
>> I don't have any objections to putting slw into the release per se,
>> but changing where the software is maintained doesn't resolve the
>> issue of who maintains it.
I've been maintaining the servers and answering questions for Alex,
so I wouldn't mind maintaining the software in the release. It hasn't
required that much maintenance over time anyway.
>> Also, if slw is going into the release under "athena", it needs to go
>> in as one package per program or library.
We can take this offline, but I notice that olc doesn't fit this
model (it's one package containing clients and server, and a couple
libraries that are only used internally). Would this model be ok for
the source tree?
Garry
