[344] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
Re: follow-up on IPM support
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David F Lambert)
Thu Jun 29 07:48:26 2000
Message-Id: <10006291148.AA22577@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 00 07:40:00 EDT
From: David F Lambert <LAMBERT@MITVMA.MIT.Edu>
To: Karen Fortoul <FORTOUL@MITVMA.MIT.Edu>, Peter B Kelley <KELLEY@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Roger A Roach <RAR@MIT.EDU>,
Enterprise Printing Delivery Project Team <printdel@MIT.EDU>,
Rachel Sage <SAGE@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 28 Jun 00 20:25:26 EDT
Thanks for the follow-up on the IPM support issue, Karen. This sounds
like a fine plan to provide some near term relief for Rocklyn. Just
holler if we can be of any assistance in the future IPM support
discussions.
Pete, would you like to send the Print Delivery Team a list of support
items which need clarification, or would it be more useful for you
to come and chat with the team directly?
Thanks to all for your responsiveness and cooperation!
Dave (for the team)
On Wed, 28 Jun 00 20:25:26 EDT you said:
>Hi -
>
>Peter and I met Tuesday and discussed the direction of IPM support.
>Rocklyn had agreed to take the lead in setting it up and do initial
>support. Peter and I agreed that we should try and find a resource
>to relieve Rocklyn "sooner rather than later". I will work on trying
>to find someone. As far as where it fits in the organization, it is
>not a clear fit in what ASST currently does and it is too early to see
>if its a fit for AAST. Therefore, Peter will be responsible for it
>for the near term (3-6 months). As part of that, there are numerous
>scope issues, which Peter will look into clarifying.
>
>Let us know if there are questions or any issues with the current
>working plan. (I will follow-up later in July regarding a resource.)
>
>- Karen -
>
>P.S. Subsequent to this meeting there was a different meeting to talk
> about AAST. There was agreement that IPM wasn't a clear fit but
> that it was one of the items we would need to address on a case
> by case basis to see if AAST made sense or if there was a better
> fit in another team.
