[919] in I/T Delivery

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

11/4 Delivery Council Notes

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Ferrara)
Mon Nov 4 18:41:13 2002

Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021104184029.021ea2f0@po11.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 18:40:52 -0500
To: delivery-mtg@menelaus.local
From: Robert Ferrara <rferrara@MIT.EDU> (by way of "Jagruti S. Patel" <jag@mit.edu>)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Hello,

Here are the Delivery Council notes for 11/4 at 1PM in W92-199, thanks to 
Lorraine.

Roundtable (20 min)

- IT-partners debrief

- Promo/equity for Jan 1st  -- starting to build list of candidates for 
promotion/equity increase.  Talk to Bob or Mark to add names to the list.

- W2K server team plans -- team composition is just about set.

- 10/31 ITLT and Strategic/Business Review meeting -- Curry's overall 
directive is to cut 3%-7% in each area in FY04.  Within about two weeks, 
each process director must compile a list of possible areas to cut. Final 
draft of FY04 budget is due December 10.  Due to Curry on December 16-17. 
DC will discuss this at next meeting, Tuesday, 11/19. (Note: this is due at 
5PM on 11/19 - Bob)

- Quarterly Report -- final updates to Bob by this Friday.  (Delivery 
monthly reports also due on Friday.)

- Personnel changes -- Larry Stone moving to ISST in Service.  Kelly Yu 
likely moving to TNS. No word yet on new hires.

- Roundtable
    Tom T. -- success in building 37.  Number of machines and users are way up.
    Tom G. -- EAST took over the Events Calendar at the end of October.
    Mark -- new vacation and bereavement policy.  Will send out email on 
some of the fine points.


EAST Business Plan (30 minutes) - Tom G.
   Desired outcome: Critique EAST's evolving plan, identify targets of 
opportunity


See Tom's mail from 11/1 for draft of model.

Issues/Questions discussed:

1. How to deal with documentation?  Who does it?  EAST or TPS or 
subcontractor? If EAST, the team would need to gain this expertise and most 
likely staff.  This isn't necessarily wise.  Depending on who does the 
work,  we need to make sure revenue is being distributed accurately to the 
group(s) doing the work?  Needs further conversation with Jeanne Cavanaugh.

2. Measuring Small, Medium, Large -- another vector to consider is the 
range of environments supported, complexity of platforms supported.  Over 
time, complexity increases.  Supporting old environments add to complexity. 
Maybe re-phrase as Low, Medium, High?

3.  Tom T. -- we need to build in the negotiation factor.

4.  What about database support?  Database Services does not provide bug 
detection, monitoring, performance tuning, etc.  What should be EAST's role 
in offering/brokering these services?

5.  Bob would like additional scenarios, comparing present suite of apps. 
with a future state.


Next steps:

- Tom G. will review with the EAST team
- Circulate to ITLT.  Target:  about a month and a half.  Worth talking to 
Theresa, Susan, and Vijay/Phil Long in advance.


Follow-up: Delivery Council Role Discussion (25 min) - MCS
   Desired outcome:
  	* Review what's coming into Delivery (Calendaring?, Listserv-> Mailman, W2K)
   	* Focused Information Sharing
   	* Budgeting in a more shared manner

We did not have time for this agenda item.


Next Meeting:  TUESDAY, November 19 at 1pm.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post