[37014] in Kerberos
Re: Issue with kvno
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Benjamin Kaduk)
Fri May 29 11:46:08 2015
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 11:45:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: vishal <vicky.recw@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG-wCMtu7+D4XQ7Sa8xfpPnUXf_rSXcBmMuhPxz2h9WoOuRXDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1505291143520.22210@multics.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: kerberos@mit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
I don't have a definite answer for you, but:
1.7 is very old.
4294967295 is 0xffffffff is -1 as a 32-bit twos-complement integer
255 is 0xff is -1 as an 8-bit twos-complement integer.
kvnos are supposed to be unsigned integers, but krb5 prior to 1.10 (and
evern moreso prior to 1.6) had bugs where they were treated as signed
quantities.
-Ben Kaduk
On Thu, 28 May 2015, vishal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did not get any answer for my query:
>
> "
> Hi,
>
> I see an issue with kvno with kerberos version 1.7 where linux server is
> sending the kvno to trusted domain as 4294967295 while it gets this as 255
> from home domain.
>
> Is this an known issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Vishal"
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:07 PM, vishal <vicky.recw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see an issue with kvno with kerberos version 1.7 where linux server is
> > sending the kvno to trusted domain as 4294967295 while it gets this as 255
> > from home domain.
> >
> > Is this an known issue?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vishal
> >
> ________________________________________________
> Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
>
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
