[1252] in Kerberos

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Future of Kerberos and Vendor support

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (kannan@sejour.nac.dec.com)
Tue Feb 19 15:15:27 1991

To: nss1!cjr@uunet.uu.net
Cc: kerberos@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 91 13:21:54 EST
From: kannan@sejour.nac.dec.com

Chris Riddick writes :

>	Both techniques are valid authentication mechanisms.  One may
>choose Kerberos over Sphinx because of its public availability and use
>of DES and passwords.  Shinx requires licensing RSA public key technology
>in order to use the system.  However, Sphinx provides an advantage over

Sphinx will be publicly available.  Digital has already licensed RSA
public key technology and Sphinx embodies the RSA patent.  Therefore
users don't need to license RSA for Sphinx.

However, Sphinx users are not authorized to use the RSA algorithm beyond
the intended use in the Sphinx (SPX) software.

	-kannan

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post