[37544] in bugtraq
Setiri + Invisible browsers != browsers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Haroon Meer)
Sat Nov 27 13:50:19 2004
Message-ID: <41A85454.90001@sensepost.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 12:17:56 +0200
From: Haroon Meer <haroon@sensepost.com>
Reply-To: haroon@sensepost.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi..
About 2 years ago, we demo'd Setiri, a win32 trojan that tunneled data
off networks through the use of Invisible Internet Explorer instances.
This allowed us to avoid sticky issues like authentication / etc and
worked nicely against personal firewalls configured to allow out IE traffic.
Despite the noise it generated back then, very little has been done to
combat the problem. So we threw together a few lines of C# and tacked on
a gratuitous .pdf (for good measure) for an angle we believe can go a
long way towards mitigating the threat..
In short : an invisible browser is not the same as a visible one, and
personal firewalls (that do outbound application control) should not
treat them the same. Application-level access control systems should be
able to detect whether an application is running visible or not.
The short paper : http://www.sensepost.com/garage_portal.html /
http://www.sensepost.com/restricted/casper.pdf
The badly written C# : http://www.sensepost.com/garage_portal.html /
http://www.sensepost.com/restricted/casper.zip
As usual, please mail questions/comments/flames to
research@sensepost.com / haroon@sensepost.com
/MH
======================================================================
Haroon Meer MH
SensePost Information Security +27 83786 6637
PGP : http://www.sensepost.com/pgp/haroon.txt haroon@sensepost.com
======================================================================
