[52225] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Harrison)
Sat Sep 21 18:34:38 2002
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 18:41:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mike Harrison <meuon@highertech.net>
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.40.0209211622150.21754-100000@clifden.donelan.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> bank's customers. Banks rarely check the signature on a check. Is
> security just perception?
Yes.
And I would expect that those people who cared about things
assumed the wireless network was insecure (just like internet)
and had secured their hardware and were using secure connection
protocols: ie: SSH.. SSL.. (oh.. do they have holes?)
Still, we do what we can.
