[195931] in North American Network Operators' Group
pd table vs 6296
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sat Sep 23 03:17:50 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:59:01 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
say i want to use pd to a fairly large aggregation. the router has to
hold the pd table. it sees some routers have limited table size, e.g.
1k. so what's a poor boy to do? the classic ipv4 solution would be
6296 <the horror!>. are folk doing pd scaling? how?
randy
