[195110] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Radu-Adrian Feurdean)
Thu Jun 22 03:00:55 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog@radu-adrian.feurdean.net>
To: "Mukom Akong T." <mukom.tamon@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHDzDLCf=jU5h3tad3oHA9JnhUCH92uhvqX8LGco7hmm1KwxFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:00:50 +0200
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017, at 08:18, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
>
> On 18 June 2017 at 17:36, Radu-Adrian Feurdean <nanog@radu-
> adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:>> so for the record, business customers are much more active in
>> *rejecting* IPv6, either explictely (they say they want it
>> disabled) or>> implicitly (they install their own router, not configured for
>> IPv6). The>> bigger the business, the bigger the chance of rejection.
>
>
> Did they per chance state their reasons for rejecting it?
Not explicitly. But when we get something like "turn off that IPv6 crap
!" we take it for: - they don't have a clearly defined need for it
- they don't know how to deal with it
- they don't want to deal with things they don't need (see the
irst point)... usually all of them at the same time.
To make it short : education. And we as as small ISP we have neither the
resources, nor the motivation (because $$$ on the issue is negative) to
do it (the education).
--
R-A.F.
