[193434] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Still)
Tue Jan 17 15:56:44 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPDTRij3mSag+jyc_wj8LSy=qhv=C_sSCBf=uE8JWc-juG4GHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Still <stillwaxin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:48:24 -0500
To: Matthew Crocker <matthew@corp.crocker.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Oops:
http://nabcop.org/index.php/IPv6_Subnetting
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Michael Still <stillwaxin@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi, a few years back some in the community got together to write this:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Matthew Crocker <
> matthew@corp.crocker.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m AS7849 and I have an IP problem.
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m running IPv4 ( /16 legacy + /20) and have enough space to la=
st me
>> for a while, multi-homed, BGP4 full tables + peering, ect.
>> I have some new shiny Juniper MX480s (RE-S-2X00x6, 64MB RAM) in my core.
>>
>> I want to start building my IPv6 infrastructure.
>>
>> I have a /32 assigned from ARIN (2001:4918::/32)
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m looking for some direction/reading list of how to properly c=
onfigure
>> IPv6. I=E2=80=99ve read to use a /64 for PtP interfaces and I=E2=80=99v=
e read use a /128
>> instead. Assign all loopbacks from the same /64, use a different /64 =
for
>> each loopback. Ect, ect.
>>
>> I=E2=80=99m trying not to light a religious war but what is the current =
best
>> practice for IPv6 deployment in a service provider network?
>>
>> PS. I=E2=80=99ll be at NANOG69 in DC next month, 1st NANOG for me afte=
r 22
>> years. =E2=98=BA
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> --
>> Matthew Crocker
>> Crocker Communications, Inc.
>> President
>>
>
>
>
> --
> [stillwaxin@gmail.com ~]$ cat .signature
> cat: .signature: No such file or directory
> [stillwaxin@gmail.com ~]$
>
--=20
[stillwaxin@gmail.com ~]$ cat .signature
cat: .signature: No such file or directory
[stillwaxin@gmail.com ~]$
