[139792] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv4 address exchange
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Curran)
Tue Apr 19 21:53:56 2011
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: Peter Thimmesch <peter.thimmesch@depository.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:53:31 +0000
In-Reply-To: <001701cbfef7$7dd5c550$79814ff0$@depository.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 19, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Peter Thimmesch wrote:
> John,
>=20
> Please note that we have filed our proposal for accreditation of IP addre=
ss
> registrars with ICANN over a month ago. (Please see ICANN's Correspondenc=
e
> Page, Letters from David Holtzman to David Olive and John Jeffrey, filed =
2
> March 2011, Proposed Statement of IP Policy)
> <http://www.icann.org/en/correspondence/statement-ip-address-registrar-ac=
cre
> ditation-policy-31mar11-en.pdf>
Excellent. Thanks for pointing that out to the Nanog community.
> In addition we pointed out, in our opinion, that the current process for
> reviewing and approving a Global Policy is somewhat skewed towards the
> Regional Internet Registries. Hence we requested that due to this obvious
> and readily apparent Conflict-of-Interest (yes, I expect you will disagre=
e
> with even this, which is so clear that to debate this would be simply too
> much even by the new standards that you have set recently in your online
> arguments with Prof. Mueller) we explore other forums to have the merits =
of
> the proposal aired.=20
I'm certain that such forums will support multi-stakeholder, private sector=
=20
led, bottom-up policy development, so that this community can participate
in consideration of the merits. Perhaps you can elaborate how the Nanog
community can get involved and provide feedback on the proposal?
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
