[42] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: LIVING WAGE SIT-IN AT HARVARD (fwd)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sourav K. Mandal)
Thu Apr 19 16:40:00 2001

Message-Id: <200104192039.QAA11772@dichotomy.dyn.dhs.org>
From: "Sourav K. Mandal" <Sourav.Mandal@ikaran.com>
Reply-To: "Sourav K. Mandal" <Sourav.Mandal@ikaran.com>
To: mit-talk@mit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 16:39:21 -0400


"Brandy L Evans <liane@MIT.EDU>" wrote:

> Well hell, Sourav, why do we have a minimum wage??

For the same reason you think that "living wage" has a moral basis.  
Yes, I think minimum wage should be abolished.  It's unfair to 
prospective employers, and unfair to the folks who are willing to work 
for less, like immigrants.

> Now wait... Let's think about this again... turn it around so that the
> WORKERS are the ones selling their services to their
> employers... Which would mean that these janitors should be trying to
> get as much as they can from Harvard. 

True!  Like I said, I have no beef with the workers getting as much 
dough as they can.  But, to turn this into a moral crusade rooted in 
"social justice" is unconscionable; not because earning money is wrong, 
but because the concept of "social justice" is wrong.

>  if they're not getting as
> much as the janitors down the street at MIT are getting, well, they
> have a few options:
[...]
> 3) Just quit and go work at MIT

That's assuming, of course, that MIT has janitorial openings.

> This has to be the most frightening statement I've heard so far. You
> value people because you value profits. Wow. I just don't think I have
> anything to say to that. I think we should all just let that statement
> sink in for a moment.

Please, be my guest!

> I'm hoping that you didn't mean it to sound as
> completely final, total, and all-encompassing as it does. If your
> little sister is no longer profiting you in any way, you no longer
> value her as a human being?

Well, I have a younger brother, and I love him very much.  I love him 
because he's honest, fun, ambitious, etc. -- these are values to me.  
If he were dishonest, whiny and generally unlikable, I would probably 
disown him.  You have to be religious, self-sacrificial or have a poor 
understanding of biology to think that blood relation has any 
significance in this context.

> <totally off-topic>
> And hello - REDUCE my caloric intake to 2300? Do you have some kind of
> superhuman metabolism? How much do you fucking EAT in a day that
> reducing it to 2300 would be such an incredible sacrifice??!!!?
> </totally off-topic>

My "guesstimate" is that I eat about 3500-4000 calories in a day (two 
1500 calorie meals, one 1000 calorie meal, and snacks).  I think my 
metabolism is normal.  I'm just bigger than average: I'm 6'1", and 
currently weigh 185 lbs., which is underweight for me.  Also, I'm 
training strenuously 3 times a week in an attempt to gain back a load 
of muscle I've lost recently; and, I play b-ball when I can on the 
local blacktop.

I'm sure my high-protein, meat-rich diet offends the sensibilites of 
the Greens out there ...

> Who is on a 1200 calorie a day diet at the moment and because of this
> is very grumpy and touchy about the subject of food.

Maybe you should exercise more.


Sourav


------------------------------------------------------------
Sourav K. Mandal

Sourav.Mandal@ikaran.com
http://www.ikaran.com/Sourav.Mandal/






home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post