[38546] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Check out- A private yacht experience

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rent A Yacht)
Tue Mar 31 14:39:21 2015

To: <mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu>
From: "Rent A Yacht" <RentAYacht@saltimo.eu>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:39:20 -0700

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">

<html>

<head>

<style type="text/css">

#tab{width: 643px; background-color: #ffff33;}

#tap{margin: 17px 0; font: 11px Arial;}

#subj{font: 23px  sans-serif; color: #330000 ; margin: auto auto 16px auto;}

#imag{background-color:#ffff33; padding-top: 11px;}

#imag1{max-width: 643px; background-color: #ffff33; padding: 10px; border: 8px double red;}

#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}

</style>

</head>

<body>

<center>

<table id="tab">

<tr>

<td align="center">

<p id="tap">

Not able to view our Adver-tisement as pictures are blank? <a href="http://www.saltimo.eu/l/lt1B9357K199V/204KE1020I52297U305PP116285397L3520839223"> simply hit this to reload'em.</a>

<br>

<br>

</p>

</td>

</tr>

<tr>

<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">

<a target="" href="http://www.saltimo.eu/l/lt1H9357F199Y/204WB1020L52297B305MM116285397R3520839223" id="subj"> Check out-  A private yacht experience </a>

</td>

</tr>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<tr>

<td align="center" id="imag" >

<a href="http://www.saltimo.eu/l/lt1F9357T199E/204RV1020M52297Y305HJ116285397V3520839223"><img src="http://www.saltimo.eu/im/VK9357GT199UM/204C1020S52297FU305E116285397MA3520839223/img019920488.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>

</td>

</tr>

<br>

<br>

<tr>

<td align="center">

<a href="http://www.saltimo.eu/l/lc4G9357L199C/204RO1020Q52297G305GX116285397B3520839223"><img src="http://www.saltimo.eu/im/NP9357WA199QG/204L1020O52297EV305U116285397YT3520839223/img119920488.jpg"/></a>

</td>

</tr>

<TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR>

<table style="width: 643px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 3px;">

<tr>

<td>

<span id="content">

<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<p align="left">natural forces, but in spite of it. The surplus value of the products of nature, which George appeals to, is KDMPXQCYY therefore not self-evident. </p>
<BR /><BR />
<p align="right">George makes one attempt to explain this surplus value, though it must be called a very lame one. He says that time, as well as labour, constitutes  NDSETAMTB 
an independent element in its production. But is this really an explanation, or is it an evasion of the explanation? How 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee comes the person 
who throws a seed of corn into the earth 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee to get compensation, out of the value of the product, not only 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee for his labour but also for the time that 
the seed has lain in the ground and grown? Is time<I>then the object of a monopoly? 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee Such an argument almost tempts one</I>to recall the naïve words of </p>
<BR /><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 8px; color: #ffffff;"></span>
<p align="center" style="font: 15px;">the old canonist, that time is a good common to all, to the debtor as to the hior, to the producer as to the consumer. [none] Of course George did not mean time, but the vegetative powers of nature  AJADCI 
actually working during time. But how should the producer manage to get himself paid for these vegetative forces of nature by a special surplus  ORN 
value in the product? Are, LOOFY then, these natural powers objects of a monopoly? 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee Are they not rather accessible to every man 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee who owns a seed of 
corn? And cannot every one put himself in possession of a seed of corn? Since the production of seed-corn can be indefinitely augmented by labour,  7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 
would the amount of corn not be steadily increased so long as a monopoly of the natural forces immanent in the grain made its possession appear  RTO 
peculiarly advantageous? SMS And would not, on that account, 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee the supply inevitably increase till the 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee extra profit due to that monopoly was absorbed, and the production of corn became no more remunerative than any </p>
<BR />
<p>other kind of production? The careful 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee reader will 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee note that in this discussion we have come back into the same groove of ideas into which we RMIWFM were brought by our criticism of 
Strasburger's Productivity SFA theory.108 In this part of his work George has MIAXKFAVW under-estimated the interest problem in the same way as Strasburger did, 
only to a greater 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee extent and with still greater RJKJAR naïvety. Both hastily conclude IRLAK that the powers of AUE nature are the cause of interest. But 
Strasburger at least made an attempt to investigate exactly the alleged causal connection between the two, MEDUQVC and to follow SINVG it out in detail. George, 
on ABJVABHK the contrary, gives us nothing but hiertions which take for granted that, in certain productions, time is an "element." It 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee is certainly not in </p>
<BR />
<p align="left" style="font: 13px;">this MHC superficial way that the great problem is to be solved. [none] Conclusion? Our attention has been too long fixed on individual 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee theories. Let us, in 
conclusion, consider the subject as a whole. We have seen the rise of a motley array of 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee interest theories. We have considered them all carefully 
and tested them thoroughly. No one of them contains 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee the whole truth. Are they on that account quite fruitless? Taken all together, do they form 
nothing but a chaos of contradiction and error, that leaves us no nearer the truth than when we started? Is it not rather the case that, through the  7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 
tangle of contradictory theories, there runs a line of development which, if it has not itself led to the truth, has at least pointed the XCPAMQU way in .</p>



<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

<br>

</span>

</td>

</tr>

</table>

<tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr>

</table>

</center>

<center><a href="http://www.saltimo.eu/unsT9357DY199W/204AS1020V52297FL305GU116285397H3520839223"><img src="http://www.saltimo.eu/im/NU9357LW199RL/204A1020B52297WP305J116285397YN3520839223/img219920488.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>

</html>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post