[38230] in Discussion of MIT-community interests

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Book, vacations... to Cancun & Save

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (All Inclusive Resorts)
Thu Mar 26 18:28:46 2015

To: <mit-talk-mtg@charon.mit.edu>
From: "All Inclusive Resorts" <AllInclusiveResorts@philicism.eu>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:28:47 -0700

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">


<html>


<head>


<style type="text/css">


#tab{width: 656px; background-color: #663300;}


#tap{margin: 11px 0; font: 10px Comic Sans;}


#subj{font: 24px  Times New Roman; color: #00ff99 ; margin: auto auto 15px auto;}


#imag{background-color:#663300; padding-top: 17px;}


#imag1{max-width: 656px; background-color: #663300; padding: 10px; border: 4px double red;}


#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}


</style>


</head>


<body>


<center>


<table id="tab">


<tr>


<td align="center">


<p id="tap">


Can't look at our news-letter at all? <a href="http://www.philicism.eu/l/lt1G9268HJ202F/207YJ1039GS49806RH305T116285397N136830754"> Make sure to browse this to reload'em.</a>


<br>


</p>


</td>


</tr>


<tr>


<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">


<a target="" href="http://www.philicism.eu/l/lt1N9268CT202G/207MA1039VJ49806GP305S116285397U136830754" id="subj"> Book, vacations... to Cancun & Save </a>


</td>


</tr>


<br>


<br>


<tr>


<td align="center" id="imag" >


<a href="http://www.philicism.eu/l/lt1R9268CB202I/207GV1039TD49806VX305R116285397N136830754"><img src="http://www.philicism.eu/im/IU9268G202X/207QI1039PB49806W305AK116285397TV136830754/img020220788.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>


</td>


</tr>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<tr>


<td align="center">


<a href="http://www.philicism.eu/l/lc4C9268HT202L/207DV1039ST49806BU305T116285397K136830754"><img src="http://www.philicism.eu/im/OS9268N202U/207BV1039EG49806R305LW116285397RP136830754/img120220788.jpg"/></a>


</td>


</tr>


<tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr><tr><td></td></tr>


<table style="width: 656px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 11px;">


<tr>


<td>


<span id="content">


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<p align="right" style="font: 12px;">without. He may calculate thus: If I had spent to-day in shooting instead of fishing I might have shot three hares, and I must now do without the  NALSCIS </p>
<BR>
<p align="right">gratification obtainable from RTQXRXAL these. I believe that this way of reckoning sacrifice is not incorrect. Here the man simply looks at work as a means to an end, and taking no notice of the 
mean—the primary sacrifice of work—fixes his attention on the end which was GXAU sacrificed through the mean. It is a method of calculation very common in 
economic life. Say that I have definitely set aside £30 for expenditure, but am hesitating between two modes of XCUAKEV spending it. LBIHOVV In the end I make up my 
mind to spend it on a pleasure trip instead of the purchase of a Persian carpet. evidently the real sacrifice which the pleasure trip 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee will hi me </p>
<BR><BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Times New Roman, Arial; font-size: 11px;"></span>
<p align="left">may be represented<u>under the form of the Persian carpet which I have to do without. [none] In any case it appears to LUXLL HEGCDK</u>me obvious that, in reckoning the 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee sacrifice made 
for any economic end, the direct sacrifice in means—that sacrifice which is first made—and the indirect sacrifice, which takes 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee the shape of other kinds 
of advantage that might have been obtained in other circumstances by 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee the means sacrificed, can be calculated only alternatively and never 
cumulatively. I may consider the sacrifice of<U>my pleasure trip to be either the £30 which it has 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee directly</U>hi me, or the persian carpet which it has 
indirectly hi me, but never as the £30 and the carpet. just in the same way our rustic may consider, as the sacrifice which the catching of the  7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 
three fish his him, either the day's work directly expended, or the three hares indirectly sacrificed (or, say, the gratification he gets from eating  EYHFKN </p>
<BR><BR><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"></span>
<p>them), but never the day's work and the gratification obtained through 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee shooting the hares. So much I think is clear. But besides these occupations, which 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee recompense him for his day's work at 
the end of the day, there are others open to our labourer which produce a result that cannot be HHSUEQGPA enjoyed till a later date. He might, e.g. sow wheat, 
getting the produce of it after a year's time; or FPJFTHJU he might plant fruit trees, from which he could have no return for ten years. Suppose he chooses 
the latter. If we again leave out of account the land and the PQHGMOTO trifling GJTP wear and tear of tools, what has he sacrificed to obtain the fruit trees? </p>
<BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, Courier New, Times New Roman, Arial; font-size: 11px;"></span>
<p>To me there seems no doubt about the answer. He has sacrificed a day's work, and nothing more. Or, if the indirect way of computation be  MXFSQPL 
preferred, instead of the day's work he may calculate the other kinds of gratification that might have BQRLCNLSO been got by spending the day in other 
ways—say the immediate 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee enjoyment of three fish, FCBPCJJS or of three hares, or of a basket of fruit. But at all events it seems to me obvious in this case 
also, that, if the gratification which might have been got through 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee the work is reckoned as sacrifice, then not the smallest portion of the work itself 
can be reckoned in the sacrifice; while,<U>if the work is reckoned as sacrifice, there cannot be 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee added</U>to that in the calculation the smallest 
fragment of the other kinds of 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee 7ea99ed1b6714702bd5343b786c98bee enjoyment that were renounced. To do otherwise would be RPKFLOXE to make a double reckoning, which would be just as false .</p>





<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


</span>


</td>


</tr>


</table>


<TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR>


</table>


</center>


<center><a href="http://www.philicism.eu/unsA9268AT202DU/207Q1039OC49806DW305A116285397OK136830754"><img src="http://www.philicism.eu/im/OO9268T202U/207MP1039KA49806Y305FS116285397YX136830754/img220220788.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>


</html>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post