[39] in APO News
Possible new STANDING POLICY?!?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (crystal@Athena.MIT.EDU)
Sun Jul 12 17:11:04 1992
From: crystal@Athena.MIT.EDU
To: apo-news@Athena.MIT.EDU
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 92 17:09:12 EDT
This is a letter that John sent me during last term and I was wondering
what everyone's opinion on it was. Should I try to get the financial part
of this passed as a stading policy? Please send mail to apo-news if you
give it a thumbs-up, a thumbs-down, or a conditional thumbs-up (i.e tell
me where you think there are problems in this possible policy). Even
indifference is okay. I'd just like to hear as many different honest
opinions as possible.
Thanks!
YiLFS,
Crystal:)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The sign up policy I think we should adopt is this...
All brothers should sign up for project when confronted with the opportunity.
There are 4 possible answerers
Yes = defiantly going
Probably = almost defiantly going
Maybe = Will go if I have the time
No = sorry, defiantly won't be going.
Two days before the project the PC calls all the people who answered
probably or maybe and asks them convert to a yes or no. Any maybe
that the PC was unable to contact goes to a no, all uncontacted
probably go to a yes.
At this point any per-capita supplies or food needed for the project
are purchased for the number of Yes answers and those people are
charged on the debt list. If they cancel they are responsible for
their portion of the bill (usually just food ) unless they can find a
replacement.
The first part you can just implement, the charging part may require
the passing of a policy, but we may already have one covering this, I
will have to check it out.
YiLFS
John W.F. McClain
------- End of Forwarded Message
