[96629] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] {-Ha'} with {-Qo'}

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick)
Sat Jul 6 08:06:14 2013

From: Rohan Fenwick <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 22:05:52 +1000
In-Reply-To: <51D80101.3080404@gmx.de>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@stodi.digitalkingdom.org

--===============6857066608676248340==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_f8ce1d15-69a3-421d-b8ac-613353888dec_"

--_f8ce1d15-69a3-421d-b8ac-613353888dec_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

ghItlhpu' Quvar=2C jatlh:
> I'm not sure if my previous message came through=2C but I like to point a=
t=20
> the examples in chapter 4.3 which use two Type Rover suffixes on one verb=
:
>=20
> pIHoHvIpbe'qu'
> pIHoHvIpqu'be'
> pIHoHqu'vIpbe'

Ahhh=2C now I see what De'vID's confusion was (about the TKD general prohib=
ition on multiple affixes of the same class=2C I guess).

Yes=2C as Quvar ably points out=2C multiple rovers on the same verb shouldn=
't be a problem. I see this as simply being because the rovers are only a "=
class" in the same way as the chuvmey are a "class"=2C that is=2C they're d=
efined only by their lack of membership in any other group.

QeS
 		 	   		  =

--_f8ce1d15-69a3-421d-b8ac-613353888dec_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>ghItlhpu' Quvar=2C jatlh:<br>&gt=
=3B I'm not sure if my previous message came through=2C but I like to point=
 at <br><div>&gt=3B the examples in chapter 4.3 which use two Type Rover su=
ffixes on one verb:<br>&gt=3B <br>&gt=3B pIHoHvIpbe'qu'<br>&gt=3B pIHoHvIpq=
u'be'<br>&gt=3B pIHoHqu'vIpbe'<br><br>Ahhh=2C now I see what De'vID's confu=
sion was (about the TKD general prohibition on multiple affixes of the same=
 class=2C I guess).<br><br>Yes=2C as Quvar ably points out=2C multiple rove=
rs on the same verb shouldn't be a problem. I see this as simply being beca=
use the rovers are only a "class" in the same way as the chuvmey are a "cla=
ss"=2C that is=2C they're defined only by their lack of membership in any o=
ther group.<br><br>QeS<br></div> 		 	   		  </div></body>
</html>=

--_f8ce1d15-69a3-421d-b8ac-613353888dec_--


--===============6857066608676248340==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

--===============6857066608676248340==--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post