|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:31:24 +0000 From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> To: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> Cc: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com> In-Reply-To: <41C02A54.24654.3AC6CE9@localhost> James A. Donald wrote: > -- > On 15 Dec 2004 at 8:51, Ben Laurie wrote: > >>People seem to be having a hard time grasping what I'm trying >>to say, so perhaps I should phrase it as a challenge: find me >>a scenario where you can use an MD5 collision to mount an >>attack in which I could not mount an equally effective attack >>without using an MD5 collision. > > > I could circulate watermarked versions of copyrighted material > without it being apparent that they were watermarked. That was the attack I was not disputing :-) -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |