[13199] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: my take on "PCP"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perry E. Metzger)
Mon May 5 08:58:49 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
To: Ralf Senderek <ralf@senderek.de>
Cc: <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: 05 May 2003 08:47:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0305050706360.1038-100000@safe.senderek.de>


Ralf Senderek <ralf@senderek.de> writes:
> On 4 May 2003, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> 
> > If you are serious, submit a full description of your hash function
> > along with your evidence of its security against known forms of attack
> > to a peer-reviewed publication.
> 
> The idea, the code, the explanation and my analysis are all in
> 
>      http://senderek.de/pcp/pcp-security.html

I said "peer reviewed publication", not "thing I put on my web site".

> And fortunately my seriousness does not at all depend on the fact
> whether or not I managed to get it into your favourite crypto journal.
> Not seeing it in print will never prevent further analysis.

Actually, it effectively will prevent it because no one will
bother. There's a great essay by Schneier on that subject.

Perry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post