[13195] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: my take on "PCP"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perry E. Metzger)
Sun May 4 11:32:58 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
To: Ralf Senderek <ralf@senderek.de>
Cc: <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: 04 May 2003 11:29:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0305041656330.3121-100000@safe.senderek.de>


Ralf Senderek <ralf@senderek.de> writes:
> I never tired to convince anyone to just trust the hash. Instead I
> presented it to the list for criticism. Still I haven't got much
> criticism with respect to the hash function.

Evaluation of things like new hash functions takes years, not days.

If you are serious, submit a full description of your hash function
along with your evidence of its security against known forms of attack
to a peer-reviewed publication.

Perry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post