[12726] in linux-announce channel archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Change lifes Path.. in A safe retreat- At rehab

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Drug and Alcohol Treatment)
Sat Apr 25 22:38:13 2015

To: <linuxch-announce.discuss@charon.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 19:38:13 -0700
From: "Drug and Alcohol Treatment" <DrugandAlcoholTreatment@exampletic.eu>

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">


<html>


<head>


<style type="text/css">


#tab{width: 611px; background-color: #999900;}


#tap{margin: 11px 0; font: 9px Arial Narrow;}


#subj{font: 21px  Arial; color: #33ff33 ; margin: auto auto 14px auto;}


#imag{background-color:#999900; padding-top: 17px;}


#imag1{max-width: 611px; background-color: #999900; padding: 11px; border: 11px double red;}


#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}


</style>


</head>


<body>


<center>


<table id="tab">


<tr>


<td align="center">


<p id="tap">


Can't look at our news-letter as pictures are blank? <a href="http://www.exampletic.eu/l/lt1BV9800VG187V/192K869C61254X305I130895471VG136830911"> simply press here to re-load.</a>


<br>


<br>


<br>


</p>


</td>


</tr>


<tr>


<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">


<a target="" href="http://www.exampletic.eu/l/lt1FF9800ER187B/192U869J61254J305A130895471PE136830911" id="subj"> Change lifes Path.. in A safe retreat- At rehab </a>


</td>


</tr>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<tr>


<td align="center" id="imag" >


<a href="http://www.exampletic.eu/l/lt1JB9800US187M/192R869F61254J305W130895471MV136830911"><img src="http://www.exampletic.eu/im/DB9800D187RT/192RR869JS61254AH305A130895471T136830911/img018719288.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>


</td>


</tr>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<tr>


<td align="center">


<a href="http://www.exampletic.eu/l/lc4MS9800LE187F/192M869Q61254O305V130895471XL136830911"><img src="http://www.exampletic.eu/im/LC9800J187AB/192EM869DA61254EL305I130895471P136830911/img118719288.jpg"/></a>


</td>


</tr>


<TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR>


<table style="width: 611px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 7px;">


<tr>


<td>


<span id="content">


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<p align="center" style="font: 14px;">not individually QJIXK visible, even through telescopes of the highest power. How, then, can such telescopes make individually visible the stars of 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e a 
nebula which is half a million times the distance of Sirius? The implication is, that a star rendered invisible by distance [115] becomes  9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e 
visible if taken twelve hundred times further off! Shall we accept this implication? or shall we not rather conclude that the nebulæ are not remote  YHGD 
galaxies? Shall we not infer that, be their 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e nature what it may, they must be at least as near to us as the extremities of our own sidereal system? </p>
<BR><BR>
<p align="right" style="font: 9px;">throughout the above argument, it is tacitly hiumed that differences of apparent magnitude among the stars, result mainly from differences of  9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e 
distance. on this hiumption the current doctrines respecting the nebulæ OYNUFI are founded; and this hiumption is, for the nonce, admitted 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e in each of the 
foregoing criticisms. From the time, however, when it was first made by Sir w. herschel, this hiumption has been 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e purely gratuitous; and it now proves 
to be inadmissible. But, awkwardly enough, its truth and its untruth are 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e alike fatal to the conclusions of those who argue after the manner of </p>
<BR><BR>
<p align="right">Humboldt. Note the alternatives. on the one hand, what follows from the untruth of the hiumption? if apparent largeness SILLB of stars FNQNQ is not due to comparative nearness, EMHD and their 
successively smaller sizes<b>to their greater and greater degrees UEUDSCAOK of remoteness, what becomes of the inferences respecting the dimensions 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e of our</b>
sidereal system and the distances of nebulæ? If, as has lately been shown, the almost invisible star 61 Cygni has a greater parallax than a Cygni,  9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e 
though, according to an estimate based on sir w. herschel’s hiumption, it should be about twelve times more distant—if, as it turns out, there exist  YMQTU 
telescopic stars which are GXBNPOF nearer to us than Sirius; of what worth is the conclusion that the nebulæ are very FLSDG remote, because their component 
luminous mhies are made visible only by high telescopic powers? clearly, if the most brilliant star in the heavens and a star that cannot be seen by  IBIE 
the naked eye, prove to be equidistant, relative distances cannot be in the least inferred from relative visibilities. And if so, nebulæ may [116] be  9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e </p>
<BR><span style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 7px; color: #ffffff;"></span>
<p>comparatively near, though the starlets of which they are made up appear extremely minute. on the other hand, what follows if the truth of the hiumption be granted?  CGHSQPTD 
the arguments used to justify this hiumption in the case of the stars, equally justify it in the case of the nebulæ. It cannot be contended that,  9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e 
on the 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e average, the apparent sizes of the stars indicate their distances, without its being admitted that, on the average, the apparent sizes 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e of 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e the 
nebulæ indicate their distances—that, generally speaking, the larger are the nearer and the smaller are the more distant. Mark, now, the necessary  9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e 
inference respecting their resolvability. The largest or<u>nearest nebulæ will KWX be most easily resolved into stars; the successively smaller</u>will be 
successively more 9fdaba190ace50880dc4155f29cb9a3e difficult of resolution; and the irresolvable ones will be the smallest ones. This, however, is exactly the reverse of QDTW the fact. .</p>





<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


<br>


</span>


</td>


</tr>


</table>


</table>


</center>


<center><a href="http://www.exampletic.eu/unsM9800QD187X/192K869F61254A305D130895471W136830911"><img src="http://www.exampletic.eu/im/TA9800P187JM/192KJ869FQ61254LD305X130895471V136830911/img218719288.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>


</html>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post